Motorcycle Rider Education
Share
The American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) has continually
advocated a comprehensive motorcycle safety program as a means of
preventing motorcycle crashes and reducing injuries and fatalities. In
addition to strongly encouraging the voluntary use of helmets, gloves,
sturdy footwear and protective garments, and strongly discouraging
impaired operation, the AMA has aggressively supported research-based,
state-approved motorcycle rider training.
Despite the indisputable value of a properly
structured rider education program, the AMA opposes legislation that
would make such training mandatory for adults. Mandated rider education
can substantially increase the expense of training, delay the delivery
of training, and has the potential to exacerbate the problem of
unlicensed riders.
State programs are already overextended attempting to
meet the needs of motorcyclists who seek training. Compulsory training
for riders of all ages would require a state to dramatically increase
the number of training sites, provide sufficient qualified instructors,
acquire more training motorcycles and equipment, and offer training
schedules to meet increased demand. In addition, if riding instructors
are forced to train students who don’t want to be trained, the
instructor corps can become disenchanted and dwindle at the very time
when more of them are needed.
Where rider education is now available, funding is
typically derived from additional fees for annual vehicle
registrations, increased license or endorsement fees, and course fees.
The motorcycling community has generally been supportive of these
methods of funding for voluntary training. Were a state government to
impose mandatory training, it would be incumbent upon its legislature
to then appropriate additional revenue to support the training of
substantially more students. These higher user fees can be a
disincentive to licensing. Furthermore, if training is not conveniently
located and readily available to potential riders, or if a student must
wait longer than 30 days to take a course, the likely result will be to
discourage new motorcyclists from going through the necessary
procedures to obtain the proper motorcycle endorsement.
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) reported in 2007 that unlicensed or improperly
licensed motorcycle operators are over-represented in fatality
statistics. Their research shows that about 26 percent of motorcyclist
fatalities nationwide involve operators with no motorcycle license or
endorsement, or no driver’s license at all. The problem is difficult
for law enforcement to address because unlicensed riding is nearly
impossible to monitor.
The AMA believes that voluntary motorcycle rider
training should be available as an incentive to increase licensure by
permitting students to become licensed following the completion of an
approved course. Riders who successfully complete rider training have
acquired basic knowledge and riding skills, and they can demonstrate
the skills necessary to meet state licensing requirements.
Furthermore, motorcycle rider training must remain
available, convenient, affordable and effective if it is to contribute
to a decline in motorcycle crashes that result in injuries and
fatalities. As an alternative to mandatory rider training, increased
funding of existing programs (while keeping user fees affordable),
improved training reciprocity between states, and other incentives such
as insurance discounts will result in more riders completing rider
training courses.
As an organization, the AMA remains committed to the
development of research-based training programs, and will continue to
cooperate with the Motorcycle Safety Foundation, state motorcycle
safety administrators, and state and federal government to provide a
sound curriculum and quality training to America’s motorcyclists.